Campaign Finance Transparency Affects Legislators’ Election Outcomes and Behavior

نویسندگان

چکیده

Do audits by executive agencies impact the behavior of those audited? Does revealing negative information about legislators affect electoral results and behavior? Institutions that encourage transparency, such as campaign finance disclosure, influence mass elite behavior. Campaign transparency provides to voters during legislative campaigns character candidates, this affects voter legislator The US Federal Election Commission conducted random 10% House members in 1970s. This FEC program is only randomized experiment a agency has on federal their electorates. We find audited were more likely retire faced competitive reelections relative control group, an effect amplified among incumbents whose revealed violations. Further, scandals are associated with lower incumbent vote shares approval advertisements 2000s.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Campaign Duration and Election Outcomes

Does campaign duration affect election outcomes? To date, this question has largely evaded political scientists, but it is reasonable to expect systematic links between campaign length and candidate performance in elections. We hypothesize that longer campaigns would help challengers' electoral fortunes, thereby curbing incumbency advantage and potentially boosting competitiveness in elections....

متن کامل

Contribution Limits and Transparency in a Campaign Finance Experiment

We experimentally compare electoral outcomes when donor contribution limits are varied. The effect of contribution limits is studied under three levels of transparency: one where donors’ preferences and donations are unobserved by the candidate and public; one where they are observed by the candidate but not the public; and one where they are observed by all. We label them full anonymity (FA), ...

متن کامل

Campaign Spending Limits, Incumbent Spending, and Election Outcomes

We study the impact of campaign spending limits for candidates in Canadian federal elections. We first demonstrate that spending limits are binding mostly for incumbent candidates. We then use this information to produce endogeneity-corrected estimates for the impact of incumbent spending on electoral vote shares. Furthermore, we examine the impact of spending limits on broader measures of elec...

متن کامل

Coalition Formation, Campaign Spending, and Election Outcomes: Evidence from Mexico∗

This paper studies pre-electoral coalition formation and its effect on election outcomes. I estimate a structural model of electoral competition in which: (i) parties can form pre-electoral coalitions to coordinate their candidate nominations, and (ii) parties make strategic campaign spending decisions in support of their candidates. The estimation strategy exploits insights from the literature...

متن کامل

Unc Charlotte Economics Working Paper Series Contribution Limits and Transparency in a Campaign Finance Experiment

We experimentally compare electoral outcomes when donor contribution limits are varied. The effect of contribution limits is studied under three levels of transparency: one where donors’ preferences and donations are unobserved by the candidate and public; one where they are observed by the candidate but not the public; and one where they are observed by all. We find that a combination of stric...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Political Science

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1540-5907', '0092-5853']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12676